ASSIGNMENT代写

美国assignment代写 阿鲁诺哈亚姆

2020-02-29 19:52

而我关心的是恢复基督教达利特与上帝关系的自主主观性和主体间的实在性。通过这首歌,Yesusaami Katruthantha Sebam和文本泰米尔民间音乐作为解放神学的一般作品,Sherinian研究了在Madurai的泰米尔达利特社区音乐的文化历史现象。用Sherinian的话说,她的作品“……阐明了那些使用和自由改写基督教民歌的人的作用,他们将这些歌曲作为日常的行为来反抗非人道的种姓性别制度和印度的阶级压迫。”(谢里宁3)我对《阿鲁诺哈亚姆》这首歌提出了一种主体间性的解读,因为它提出了基督教达利特人格解放的可能性。我相信苦难的界限必须被打开,带出超越苦难的方面,尽管苦难不能被忽视为基督徒达利特人格自我建构的必要方面。这是由于诠释学的比喻使用出埃及记的经验[11]和上帝作为一个受苦的仆人这是这个模板的一部分定位达利特诠释学和塑造的主题。因此,一方面再现悲情的形象,另一方面再现武断和愤怒的达利特存在,在更大的达利特话语中创造了一种二元性的形象。这首歌的第四节是“Maa Kiribati venue, Ilavidil naan verumayae”,[12]也落入类似的陷阱,耗尽自己的人格,以达到目的,这既是现实主义,也是批判这种文学比喻的理由,因为它具体化并复制了主导与非主导的范畴。这使得自由主义议程成为一项艰巨的任务。
美国assignment代写 阿鲁诺哈亚姆
While my concern is to recover an autonomous subjectivity and intersubjective reality of the Christian Dalit’s relationship with Godhead. Through the song, Yesusaami Katruthantha Sebam and in-text Tamil Folk Music as Liberation Theology as a work in general, Sherinian looks into the cultural-historical phenomenon of the music of Tamil Dalit community in Madurai. In Sherinian’s words, her work “… elucidates the agency of those who use and freely recompose Christian folk songs as everyday acts of resistance to the inhuman systems of caste gender, and class oppression in India.” (Sherinian 3) I pose an intersubjective reading through the song Arunodhayam as it brings up the liberating possibilities of the Christian Dalit personality. I believe the limits of suffering must be broached, bring out the aspects which are beyond suffering, though suffering cannot be disregarded as a necessary aspect of the self-construction of the Christian Dalit personality. It is owing to the hermeneutical trope of the use of exodus experience[11] and God as a suffering servant which is part of this template of positioning Dalit Hermeneutics and fashioning of the subject. Thus, reproducing the image of pathos on the one hand and on the other or the assertive and angry Dalit existence, creating a duality of images within the larger Dalit discourse. Stanza 4 of the Song phrased “Maa Kiribati venue, Ilavidil naan verumayae”[12]falls for a similar trap, of exhausting one’s own personhood, in order to attain agency is both realism and a reason to critique such a literary trope, as it reifies and reproduces the dominant and non-dominant categories. This makes the liberationist agenda, a demanding task.