美国密歇根作业代写:足球风险

2020-01-06 08:25

然而，许多对手仍然认为足球的好处大于它给年轻人带来的风险。罗伯特•格拉特(Robert Glatter)等批评人士表示，不让孩子玩橄榄球，剥夺了他们获得冒险特质的机会。通过消除解决足球的孩子”,它并不完全清楚,消除冒险行为从童年是我们社会的最佳利益”(面值8)。虽然这是真的,有很多其他的运动和活动,可以为孩子提供冒险挑战,它可以被证明是有用的足球,和安全。反对者还说，没有真正的证据表明脑震荡会导致长期的健康影响。Robert Glatter解释说，并没有“实质性的科学证据表明青少年中发生的次脑震荡甚至脑震荡影响会对精神错乱产生长期的健康影响”(标准10)。相反，最近对职业和青年球员的新研究已经获得了信息，并发现了许多长期影响，如CTE的诊断、二次冲击综合征、痴呆，甚至年轻和老年足球运动员的阿尔茨海默病的早期症状。因此，脑震荡的情况非常严重。虽然可能会出现脑震荡，但仍然可以采取措施来预防。政府应该采取政治行动，执行规则，限制儿童踢足球。通过制定这些规则，它们可以应用到学校，并由此可以提出更多的选择，如不那么危险的运动。此外，学校应该告诉家长足球的高风险和危险。如果许多家长了解这项运动的风险，那么他们就可以教育孩子，向他们解释足球的危险。最后，学校的体育项目应该有一个非碰撞版本的足球。这可以作为一个伟大的选择，以发挥充分接触足球。它教孩子们如何安全地玩游戏，并帮助他们学习更好的对付技巧。
美国密歇根作业代写:足球风险
Many opponents however, still believe that the benefits of football outweigh its risks for the youth. Critics such as Robert Glatter say that by not allowing children to play tackle football it deprives the chance for them to gain risk taking characteristics. By eliminating tackle football to kids is ” that it is not entirely clear that the elimination of risk-taking behaviors from childhood is in the best interest of our society” (Par 8). While that is true, there are many other sports and activities that can provide risk taking challenges for children, which can prove to be as useful as football, and safer.Opponents also say that there is no real proof that concussions can lead to long term health effects. Robert Glatter explains that there is not “Substantive scientific evidence indicating that sub-concussive or even concussive impacts in youth have delirious long-term health effects” (Par 10). On the contrary, new recent studies on professional and youth players have obtained information and found many long-term effects such as diagnoses of CTE, Second Impact syndrome, Dementia, and even early symptoms of Alzheimer’s in young and older football players. Thus, making the case of concussions very serious.While there may be concussions rising, action can still be taken to prevent this. The government should take political action and enforce rules to restrict football to children. By making those rules, they can be applied to schools and from there more alternatives can be suggested such as less dangerous sports. Also, the schools should inform parents about the high risks and dangers of football. If many parents learn and understand the risks of this sport, then they can teach and explain to their children the dangers of football. Finally, Sports programs in schools should have a non-collision version of football. This can serve as a great alternative to playing full contact football. It teaches children how to play the game safely, and helps them learn about better techniques on tackling.

• 上一篇：美国密歇根代写Assignment:经济移民
• 下一篇：北美密歇根代写Assignment 发展的机会