美国MBA作业代写:类是野蛮的

2018-10-09 13:26

然而，真正意义上的自然状态[7]从未存在于人类社会中。也许作为一种自然状态，我们可以举人类社会出现的例子，当时人类是野蛮的，生活在游牧民族中。在那个发展阶段，人类除了生存和生存之外，什么都不知道。人们没有受到任何限制和压力。他们展示了他们真实的存在和对自我实现的渴望。作为那种生物，所有人的本性都是平等的。在那个阶段，“所有不受限制的人都倾向于确保和优化他们自己的实现，然后这种不受限制的竞争导致一种完全不确定和危险的状态。“此外，“他们认为自己对于消除通过进入公民社会而建立安全与和平状态的趋势是必不可少的。”[9]的许多启蒙论者声称自然状态存在于人类社会,但男人出来的国家因为他害怕其他的人类,[10]考虑到自然状态的主导社会混乱,为了保护自己人类被迫得出结论“社会契约”。在这种契约下，个体的自我实现自由受到限制，因此个体的所有自由可以共同存在。“每个人都放弃他们无限的权利，接受限制，接受共存中的安全与和平。每个人都有自我实现的自然权利。这种个人实现的权利“不能被废除，因为它将意味着生活的毁灭。”“然而，[12]可能受到限制，以这种方式可以与所有人的其他不可剥夺权利并存。这些限制被编入了立法。这些限制是启蒙思想家霍布斯，洛克，卢梭，休谟学说的基础。他们创造了“统治的‘宗教主义’和任何公平的统治的新的政治合法性——从社会关系中提取并基于对人权的尊重。
美国MBA作业代写:类是野蛮的
Nevertheless, the state of nature in its true form [7] never existed in human society. Perhaps as a state of nature we can take the examples of the emergence of human society when man was savage and lived in hordes. The human at that point of development was not aware of anything, except livelihood and survival. People acted free from all restrictions and pressures. They showed their true existence and the desire to own fulfillment. As creatures of that kind, all people were and are equal by their nature. At that stage, “all people without restriction tend to insure and optimize their own fulfillment, then this unlimited competition lead to a state of complete uncertainty and danger.” [8] Moreover, “they consider themselves indispensable for the elimination of this tendency to establish a state of security and peace by entering in a civil society.” [9] Many of the Enlightenment theorists claim that the state of nature existed in the human society, but man came out of that state because he was afraid of the other humans, [10] considering that in the state of nature dominates social chaos and in order to protect himself the human was obliged to conclude the “social contract”.With this contract individual’s freedom of self-fulfillment was restricted, so that individual freedom of all can exist together. “Everyone gives up their unlimited right, accepts limitations and with that accept the security and the peace in coexistence.” [11] Everyone has the natural right of personal fulfillment. This right of personal fulfillment “cannot be abolished because it would mean the destruction of livelihood.” [12] However, it may be restricted and in that way can exist in parallel with the other inalienable rights of all people. The restrictions are codified in legislations. Following, these restrictions were the basis of the doctrines of the Enlightenment thinkers Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Hume. [13] They created “‘the laicism’ of governing and new political legitimacy of any fair ruling – to be extracted from the social relations and based on respect of human’s rights.

• 上一篇：美国德克萨斯代写Assignment:工业工程
• 下一篇：德克萨斯代写Assignment:右翼的反应