ASSIGNMENT代写

耶鲁大学代写论文:教育系统收益

2018-03-27 20:15

但尽管这些发展和增长,高等教育质量仍是主要关心教育系统中的所有利益相关者即学生、父母、机构管理、教员、决策者和社会作为一个整体,因为高等教育质量差影响任何国家的整体进步。印度的高等教育远远偏离了全球教育标准。印度在最近发布的(2011年)世界大学排名中遥遥领先。印度在世界上没有100所大学。这三个排名——泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名,上海交通大学编制的世界大学的学术排名,以及QS世界大学的排名——都刚刚出炉,而我们这些著名的学府,如iit和IIMs,都没有进入前200名。尽管总体而言,美国大学在哈佛和普林斯顿大学的三项排名中都占据了主导地位,但其他大多数国家都领先于印度,包括泰国。IIT Bombay发现自己在2010年的第225位的位置远远超过了第187位,IIT德里排名第218位,而IIT Madras在QS排名中排名第281位。这些数据表明,印度高等教育在世界高等教育机构的质量方面并没有立足之地。
耶鲁大学代写论文:教育系统收益
But in spite of all these developments and growth, quality of higher education remained the main concern for all the stakeholders in the education system i.e. students, parents, institution management, faculty members, policy makers and society as a whole because poor quality of higher education effects the overall progress of any nation. Indian higher education is far away from the global educational standard. India is nowhere in the recently released (year 2011) world universities rankings. India doesn't figure in world to 100 universities. The three rankings - Times Higher Education world University Rankings, Academic rankings of world universities compiled by Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and QS World University Rankings - are just out and none of our prestigious institutions of learning like the IITs and the IIMs make it to the top-200. While overall, US universities dominate all three rankings with its Harvard and Princeton, most of the other countries are ahead of India, including Thailand. IIT Bombay finds itself at the 225th position far beyond of 187th position in 2010, IIT Delhi is on 218th position and IIT Madras is on 281st position in the QS rankings. These data represents that Indian higher education does not stand anywhere among the world higher education institutions with respect to quality.