宾夕法尼亚作业代写:政府政策
ASSIGNMENT代写

宾夕法尼亚作业代写:政府政策

2017-04-01 00:37

虽然有一个不断增加的作品致力于长-站媒体及其消费受众之间的关系,很少有学者关注媒体的社会在政府政策的影响,在英国或任何其他类似的自由民主国家。这样做的原因很简单:政府政策专家们充分认识到现代大众传媒操纵倾向的机器,很少关注“发现”显示在电视上,在报纸和万维网。事实上,两家机构目前在记录器对犯罪的问题在英国记者试图揭露内政部认为不足的政策释放的罪犯,尤其是那些不来自英国,使结婚的媒体的报道犯罪持续担忧移民是在2006年。更关注的唐宁街和媒体之间的和谐是“现金- -荣誉”丑闻,打算实现政府层级高调的犯罪行为。媒体和政府之间的战线就画在意识形态与英国公众出现行这个论点的最大受害者。最终,因此,政府(尤其是目前新工党政府)更关心媒体的立场的现任后果比他们与犯罪等重要媒体首先设法积累数据。这是一分之二十世纪政府的本质,公众舆论,利用大众媒体的力量,可以改变政府的立场,无论政策首次实现的信念。被迫辞职的前内政大臣查尔斯•克拉克的力量证明媒体关于点燃人事变动人员的政府内阁,即便这种变化不是实实在在的政策变化。
宾夕法尼亚作业代写:政府政策
Yet while there is an ever increasing body of work dedicated to the long‑standing relationship between the media and its consumerist audience, there has been scant academic attention paid to the effect of media portrayals of society upon government policy, either in the UK or in any other comparable free democratic country. The reason for this is simple: government policy experts are fully aware of the manipulative tendencies of the modern mass media machine and pay little attention to the ‘findings’ displayed on television, in newspapers and on the world wide web. In fact, the two institutions are currently at logger heads over the issue of crime in Britain as journalists attempt to expose the perceived inadequacies of the Home Office’s policy on the release of offenders, particularly offenders who do not come from the UK, which enables the media to marry the reportage of crime to the ongoing concern over immigration in 2006. Of far more concern to the harmony between Downing Street and the press is the ‘cash‑for‑honours’ scandal that intends to implement the government hierarchy in a high profile criminal act. The battle lines between the media and government are thus drawn upon ideological lines with the British public appearing to be the single greatest casualty of this argument. Ultimately, therefore, governments (particularly the present New Labour government) are far more concerned with the incumbent consequences of the media’s stance on matters such as crime than they are with how the media managed to accumulate the data in the first place. This is the nature of twenty first century government where public opinion, harnessed by the power of the mass media, can alter a government’s stance regardless of the conviction with which the policy was first implemented. The forced resignation of former Home Secretary Charles Clarke is proof of the power of the media with regards to igniting personnel change in a government cabinet even if this change of personnel is not followed by a tangible change in policy.