美国普林斯顿Assignment代写:智力残疾服务

2017-04-25 00:29

有人建议，智力残疾服务的用户和他们的照顾者使用物理约束的意见研究主要是未开发的。霍金斯等人的研究（2005，pp19-31）采访了八服务用户/工作人员对他们的行为干预措施，导致克制的使用经验，在相互参与的一周。他们的研究表明，服务使用者和工作人员经历了消极的情绪后，使用物理干预。对过程缺乏控制方面的不可预知性出现增加员工和服务用户的紧张的经验。可以说，使用身体约束的控制上增加照顾者的水平在他/她照顾那些智障人士的显示具有挑战性的行为。然而，这种收益需要平衡的明确定义的基本原理和道德的影响，而审查的文献周围的道德影响的物理干预的使用，人们发现，法律对身体约束的使用是非常复杂的。因此，由于字的局限性，本文献回顾的道德影响的轮廓进行讨论和审查。对身体的约束是同意使用能力同意的伦理困境，对学习障碍护士职业责任和那些不合格的社会保健工作者在保护在他们的照顾者免受伤害（护士及助产士委员会（NMC），2004，pp1-5）。此外，人权法（1998）指出，使用身体约束构成限制一个人的自由和自主.
美国普林斯顿Assignment代写:智力残疾服务
It is suggested that research into the views of intellectual disability service users and their carers on the use of physical restraint is largely unexplored. A study by Hawkins et al (2005, pp19-31) interviewed eight service user/staff pairs about their experiences of behavioural interventions that resulted in the use of restraint, within one week of their mutual involvement. Their study showed that both the service users and the staff experienced negative emotions following the use of physical intervention. The unpredictability about aspects of the process and lack of control appeared to increase the stressful experience for both staff and service user.Arguably, the use of physical restraint increases the caregiver’s level of control in his/her care for those with intellectual disabilities who display challenging behaviour. However, this gain needs to be balanced against the clearly defined rationales and the ethical implications.Whilst reviewing the literature surrounding the ethical implications of the use of physical intervention it was found that the law on the use of physical restraint is extremely complex. Therefore, due to the word limitations of this literature review an outline of the ethical implications will be discussed and reviewed. Ethical dilemmas on the use of physical restraint lie with consent and the capacity to consent, the professional responsibility of the learning disabilities nurse and those of unqualified social care workers in protecting those in their care from harm (Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2004, pp1-5). Also the Human Rights Act (1998) states that the use of physical restraint constitutes a restriction on a person’s liberty and autonomy

• 上一篇：普林斯顿代写Assignment:独特的战术
• 下一篇：普林斯顿代写Assignment:布什总统的管理